Anthropic proposes a Cyber Jailbreak Severity scale (CJS 0–4) with Amazon, Microsoft, Google
Anthropic detailed Claude Fable 5's safety classifiers and proposed a Cyber Jailbreak Severity (CJS) framework that scores a jailbreak's danger on a 0–4 scale. For developers building on AI, it offers a shared way to rate how serious a successful jailbreak really is, rather than vendor-by-vendor safety claims.
With Claude Fable 5 redeployed globally, Anthropic published more detail on the model's cybersecurity safeguards and proposed a shared industry framework, developed with Amazon, Microsoft and Google under Project Glasswing.
Key points
- A four-tier classifier in Fable 5 blocks prohibited uses (ransomware, wipers, cyber-physical sabotage, defense evasion, malware development/delivery, C2 infrastructure, backbone attacks) while allowing legitimate defensive work (secure coding, patch management, SOC analysis, malware reverse-engineering, incident response) with minimal restrictions.
- The Cyber Jailbreak Severity (CJS) scale runs 0–4, scored on four measures: capability gain, breadth of that gain, ease of weaponisation, and discoverability.
- Summed scores map to bands: CJS-1 Low (1–3.5), CJS-2 Medium (4–6.5), CJS-3 High (7–8.5), CJS-4 Critical (9–10).
- It is a proposed, open framework meant to standardize how vendors and regulators rate the severity of a successful jailbreak.
Source
Anthropic
#Anthropic#Claude Fable 5#AI safety#jailbreak#cybersecurity
This summary was written by the ORA·tech AI assistant. Read the original for full context.